Roadmunk no longer exists under that name. Tempo Software acquired it, announced 23 November 2021, and renamed it Strategic Roadmaps from 1 July 2024; roadmunk.com now redirects straight to tempo.io. The product is still sold and still priced per editor. This page compares what it costs now against the tools people actually search for instead.
Checked 22 August 2026, against Tempo's own pricing page and each alternative's pricing page.
What actually happened to Roadmunk?
The short version is acquisition, not closure. Tempo Software announced the acquisition on 23 November 2021, and the product itself was renamed Strategic Roadmaps with effect from 1 July 2024. roadmunk.com now 308-redirects straight to tempo.io, so anyone who bookmarked the old domain lands somewhere that does not carry the name they searched for.
That is worth separating from the tools in this category that have closed outright since 2025. Development on the original product has slowed since the acquisition, the usual pattern when a larger company buys a smaller roadmap tool and folds it into its own. The product did not die. The name did, and the pace of change on it slowed too.
What does Roadmunk cost as Strategic Roadmaps?
| Tier | Price | Priced per |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $19 an editor a month, billed yearly | editor |
| Business | $49 an editor a month | editor |
| Professional | $99 an editor a month | editor |
| Enterprise | Custom | n/a |
Starter is confirmed at $19 an editor a month, billed yearly, on Tempo's own pricing page. Business and Professional are listed at $49 and $99 an editor a month; the billing basis is not separately confirmed for those two, so check before assuming it matches Starter's yearly rate. Every tier adds $5 a month for each reviewer beyond the plan's allowance, and Enterprise is priced on request.
Behind that pricing sits Strategic Roadmaps' compliance load-out: ISO/IEC 27001 and 27701 certification, SOC 2, and GDPR, a genuine answer for a buyer whose procurement process asks for it, and not something a small self-hosted or static roadmap tool is set up to produce.
How do the alternatives compare?
| Tool | Free tier | Entry paid | Priced per | Top published tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roadmunk (Strategic Roadmaps) | None, 14-day trial | $19 an editor a month, billed yearly | editor | Enterprise, custom |
| Productboard | Yes, $0 | $19 a maker a month, billed yearly | maker | Enterprise, custom |
| Canny.io | 25 tracked users | $79 a month billed yearly, $99 billed monthly | tracked user | Business, custom |
| UserVoice | None, 30-day trial via demo | Not published | volume, tools, integrations | Not published |
| Docket | Never expires | $99, once | n/a | n/a |
Which alternative is the closest replacement for what Roadmunk actually does?
Productboard is the nearest like-for-like. It is independent rather than sitting inside a larger acquirer, has a real $0 tier with 50 AI credits a month rather than a time-limited trial, and its paid tiers start at $19 a maker a month billed yearly, or $25 monthly, rising to $59 billed yearly, or $75 monthly, at Business, with a 2-maker minimum. Productboard's own pricing page is specific about the unit: "Pricing is based on the number of makers in your workspace," and contributors "don't count toward your maker limit," which matters if most people touching the roadmap are viewers rather than editors. SAML SSO, SCIM and audit logs are Enterprise only, the same gate most of this category uses.
Does switching away from an acquired vendor actually solve the problem?
Not necessarily. UserVoice was itself acquired by Curious, announced 13 November 2025, and its site footer now reads "A Curious Company." UserVoice does not publish a price at all: its pricing page says the plan is "based on feedback volume, tools leveraged and the integrations you connect, never by seat," and the only way to start a trial is to book a demo. It carries SOC 2 Type II and PCI-DSS, and runs a comparison hub of its own, at uservoice.com/alternatives, against Pendo, Featurebase, Productboard, Canny.io, Aha, Frill.co and Savio. If the reason for leaving Roadmunk is specifically not wanting to plan around somebody else's acquisition, UserVoice is a live example of the same risk arriving again, not evidence that it cannot.
What about a tool that does feedback and roadmap together?
Canny.io covers more ground than Roadmunk ever tried to: 25 tracked users free, then $79 a month billed yearly or $99 monthly, priced per tracked user rather than per editor. Its Autopilot AI reads support conversations from Intercom, Zendesk, Freshdesk, Gong and Zoom into triaged feedback without anyone filing a ticket, and it syncs with HubSpot and Salesforce so requests can be weighted by account value. That is a different kind of product, built around customer-facing feedback first and a roadmap view second, rather than Roadmunk's roadmap-first, portfolio-planning approach, and the two are not quite interchangeable even where the price looks comparable.
Where does Docket fit against a roadmap tool like this?
Honestly, only partway. Docket is not a portfolio roadmap planning tool: no editor-versus-reviewer distinction, no maker-based seat pricing and no ISO or SOC 2 paperwork, because it is static files plus two small endpoints rather than a compliance-audited SaaS platform. What it does include, on every tier, is a public roadmap, a changelog, and unlimited products for one payment rather than a recurring per-editor bill: $99 once, rather than $19 an editor every month. For a team that wants Roadmunk's public-facing roadmap and changelog without the per-editor pricing, that is worth pricing against. For the reviewer workflow and portfolio planning Roadmunk built its name on, Productboard is the closer match, and Docket is not trying to be the same product.
One payment, no subscription, unlimited products.
How should you actually decide?
Start with what you are actually planning: individual product features, or a portfolio of several products and the trade-offs between them. Roadmunk and Productboard are both built for the second job, priced per person who edits the plan rather than per person who reads it. Canny.io and Docket are built for the first job, a public place customers vote on and a roadmap view that comes out of it, with Canny.io adding a support-inbox integration layer neither Roadmunk nor Docket has.
Then check who owns the vendor: this category has an acquisition in progress on both sides of this comparison, Roadmunk under Tempo and UserVoice under Curious. Neither means the product is about to close, but both are recent enough that asking whether it will still be the same product next year is fair, of the tool you are moving to as much as the one you are leaving.
For the full pattern of acquisitions, rebrands and closures, see the graveyard. For every vendor's pricing side by side, see what feedback tools actually cost. And for what a feature request tool is built from in the first place, see feature request tools.
Frequently asked questions
What happened to Roadmunk?
Tempo Software acquired it, announced 23 November 2021, and renamed it Strategic Roadmaps with effect from 1 July 2024. roadmunk.com now redirects straight to tempo.io. The product is still sold and still priced per editor; development on the original product has slowed since the acquisition, the usual pattern when a larger company buys a smaller roadmap tool.
Is Roadmunk still available to buy?
Yes, under the name Strategic Roadmaps. Tempo's pricing page lists Starter at $19 an editor a month billed yearly, Business at $49, and Professional at $99, plus $5 a month for each additional reviewer, with Enterprise priced on request.
What is the closest alternative to Roadmunk?
Productboard: an independent, maker-priced roadmap tool with a real $0 free tier rather than a time-limited trial, and paid tiers from $19 a maker a month billed yearly. Its pricing model is closer to Roadmunk's editor-based approach than a tracked-user tool like Canny.io is.
Does Roadmunk (Strategic Roadmaps) have any certifications the alternatives don't?
Yes: ISO/IEC 27001 and 27701 certification and SOC 2, alongside GDPR compliance. That is a real answer for a buyer whose procurement process requires it, and not something a small self-hosted or static roadmap tool is set up to produce.
Can Docket replace Roadmunk?
Only partly. Docket includes a public roadmap and a changelog on every tier for one payment rather than a recurring per-editor bill, but has no editor-versus-reviewer workflow, no maker-based seat pricing and no compliance certification, because it is static files rather than a portfolio-planning platform. For a straightforward roadmap and changelog, it is a fit; for the reviewer workflow Roadmunk built its name on, Productboard is the closer match.