How do Docket and GitHub Issues compare?
| Docket | A GitHub Issues board | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $99 once | Free on public repos |
| Hosting and maintenance | Yours | None, ever |
| Customers need an account | No | A GitHub account |
| Lives on your domain | Yes | No, github.com/you/repo |
| Voting | Yes, ranked | Reactions only |
| Changelog | Yes, written for you | Releases, a developer artifact |
| Roadmap | Yes | A Projects board, if you build one |
| Testimonials and FAQ | Yes | No |
| Complaints indexed by Google | Under your control | Public and permanent |
| Email notifications | Yes | Yes, and genuinely good |
GitHub's plan details read from github.com/pricing on 23 August 2026. Issues and Discussions are free on public repositories; a private repo with outside collaborators needs Team at $4 per user per month.
The account is the whole problem
To post on your issue tracker, somebody needs a GitHub account. If you sell developer tools, that is nothing: they already have one and they would rather file an issue than fill in a form.
If you sell a Mac app, an iOS app or anything to a person who does not write code, it is close to a wall. They will not create a developer account to tell you a button is in the wrong place. They will email you, or more likely they will not.
The second problem is quieter and lasts longer. Every complaint about your product sits on a public, permanent, Google-indexed page attached to your product's name. That is a fair price for an open source project. It is a strange thing to volunteer for a paid product.
What Docket is
Docket arrives as a GitHub repository you copy into your own account. It gives you a feedback board, a public roadmap, a changelog, an FAQ and a testimonials wall, on your own domain, for as many products as you ship. Every item a customer submits is written into your repository as a Markdown file, so there is no database and nothing to be billed for by the row.
The part that is genuinely different is the agentic side: scheduled jobs draft the first reply in your voice, write the changelog from what you actually shipped, and tell everybody who voted for something when it lands. You approve; it sends.
What a GitHub Issues board is
GitHub Issues, with Discussions turned on, is a properly good tool and it is free on public repositories. Full text search, permalinks, labels, milestones, assignees, and threaded email notifications with reply-by-email that work better than most products manage. GitHub absorbs the spam and the abuse reports. There is nothing to host, patch or back up, and there never will be.
Its best feature is one nothing else here has: a request links directly to the commit and the release that shipped it. The conversation and the fix are the same object.
The boards above, live.
Where Docket wins
- Your customers do not need an account. Docket's submit form asks for a sentence and, if they want a reply, an email address. That is all.
- It lives on your domain. Not on github.com, under a repository name, next to your source code.
- Real voting. A thumbs-up reaction is not a vote. Docket ranks requests, shows the count and tells voters when their thing ships.
- A changelog customers can read. GitHub Releases is a list of developer artifacts. Docket writes release notes in plain English from what you shipped.
- It is not a bug tracker. Assignees, labels and "open or closed" are the wrong vocabulary to put in front of somebody who bought your app.
- You choose what is public. Rather than everything, forever, indexed.
Where a GitHub Issues board is the better buy
- Free, and free permanently. Not a trial, not a tier. Free on public repositories with no catch.
- Zero maintenance, zero spam handling. No server, no database, no patching. GitHub deals with the abuse.
- The best email of anything here. Threaded, reply-by-email, and no deliverability work for you at all.
- The request links to the fix. One click from the complaint to the commit that closed it. Docket keeps them in one repository, which is close, but GitHub does it natively.
- If your users are developers, it is arguably the right answer. And this page will not pretend otherwise.
Is there a free version of GitHub Issues?
GitHub Issues is the free option, which makes this section short. It is free on public repositories, and a private repository with outside collaborators needs a Team plan at $4 per user per month, which is unworkable for customers anyway.
Docket's free edition is also free, never expires, and puts one board on your own domain that anybody can post to without an account.
So which should you pick?
Use GitHub Issues if your customers are developers, if your project is open source, or if you need something in the next ten minutes and have no budget. It is genuinely good and it costs nothing.
Use Docket if the people you support bought an app rather than cloned a repository.
Frequently asked questions
Is GitHub Issues good enough as a feedback board?
Can customers vote on GitHub?
Can I keep it private?
Can I move issues into Docket?
Know what your customers need.
One payment, for every product and update you ever ship.